Member-only story

Directing Shakespeare in America: Current Practices

Anton Foster

·14.1k Followers· Follow

Published in Charles Ney

7 min read

359 View Claps

64 Respond

Save

Listen

Directing Shakespeare in America: Current Practices

by Charles Ney

4.2 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	4518 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	377 pages

William Shakespeare's plays have captivated audiences for centuries, and they continue to be performed frequently in theaters across America. However, directing Shakespeare in the 21st century presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. In this article, we will explore the current practices of directing Shakespeare in America, examining various approaches and their impact on the interpretation and reception of these timeless plays.

Traditional Approaches

Traditional approaches to directing Shakespeare focus on preserving the integrity of the text and the playwright's original intent. Directors working in this style strive to create productions that are faithful to the language, characters, and themes of the play. They may use period costumes and sets, and they may prefer actors who speak with a traditional Shakespearean accent.

One of the advantages of a traditional approach is that it allows audiences to experience Shakespeare's plays in a way that is close to the way they were originally performed. This can be especially valuable for educational purposes, as it can help students to understand the historical and cultural context of the plays.

However, traditional approaches can also be limiting. They can restrict directors' creativity, and they can make it difficult to connect with contemporary audiences. In addition, some critics argue that traditional approaches can perpetuate outdated stereotypes and biases about Shakespeare's characters and themes.

Modern Adaptations

Modern adaptations of Shakespeare's plays take a more flexible approach to the text and the playwright's original intent. Directors working in this style may make significant changes to the language, characters, and setting of the play. They may use modern costumes and sets, and they may prefer actors who speak with a contemporary accent.

One of the advantages of a modern adaptation is that it can make Shakespeare's plays more accessible to contemporary audiences. By updating the language and setting, directors can make the plays more relatable and engaging. In addition, modern adaptations can allow directors to explore new interpretations of the plays, and they can challenge traditional assumptions about Shakespeare's characters and themes.

However, modern adaptations can also be controversial. Some critics argue that they distort Shakespeare's original intent, and that they can be disrespectful to the playwright's legacy. In addition, modern adaptations can be difficult to do well. It is important for directors to strike a balance between updating the play and preserving its essential elements.

Cross-Cultural Interpretations

Cross-cultural interpretations of Shakespeare's plays explore the plays through the lens of different cultures. Directors working in this style may cast actors from diverse backgrounds, and they may use costumes and sets that draw from non-Western traditions. They may also adapt the language and setting of the play to reflect a specific culture.

One of the advantages of a cross-cultural interpretation is that it can bring new perspectives to Shakespeare's plays. By exploring the plays from different cultural viewpoints, directors can challenge traditional assumptions about the plays' characters and themes. In addition, cross-cultural interpretations can help to make Shakespeare's plays more relevant to contemporary audiences.

However, cross-cultural interpretations can also be challenging. It is important for directors to be respectful of the cultures they are borrowing from, and they must be careful not to exoticize or stereotype the actors or the play. In addition, cross-cultural interpretations can be difficult to do well. It is important for directors to have a deep understanding of the cultures they are working with, and they must be able to adapt the play in a way that is both authentic and engaging.

Gender and Race in Shakespeare

In recent years, there has been a growing movement to address issues of gender and race in Shakespeare's plays. Directors working in this style may cast actors of different genders and races in traditionally gendered or racialized roles. They may also adapt the language and setting of the play to explore issues of gender and race.

One of the advantages of exploring issues of gender and race in Shakespeare's plays is that it can challenge traditional assumptions about the plays' characters and themes. By casting actors of different genders and races, directors can open up new possibilities for interpretation, and they can challenge stereotypes about the roles that women and people of color can play.

However, exploring issues of gender and race in Shakespeare's plays can also be controversial. Some critics argue that it is a form of political correctness, and that it distorts Shakespeare's original intent. In addition, it can be difficult to do well. It is important for directors to be sensitive to the issues they are exploring, and they must be careful not to oversimplify or trivialize them.

Decolonizing Shakespeare

Decolonizing Shakespeare is a movement that seeks to challenge the ways in which Shakespeare's plays have been used to justify colonialism and oppression. Directors working in this style may cast actors from indigenous and non-Western cultures, and they may use costumes and sets that draw from non-Western traditions. They may also adapt the language and setting of the play to reflect a decolonial perspective.

One of the advantages of decolonizing Shakespeare is that it can challenge the ways in which Shakespeare's plays have been used to justify colonialism and oppression. By casting actors from indigenous and non-Western cultures, directors can give voice to marginalized perspectives, and they can challenge the Eurocentric bias that has dominated Shakespearean performance for centuries.

However, decolonizing Shakespeare can also be challenging. It is important for directors to be respectful of the cultures they are borrowing from, and they must be careful not to exoticize or stereotype the actors or the play. In addition, decolonizing Shakespeare can be difficult to do well. It is important for directors to have a deep understanding of the cultures they are working with, and they must be able to adapt the play in a way that is both authentic and engaging.

Directing Shakespeare in America is a complex and challenging task. There is no one right way to approach the plays, and the best approach will vary depending on the director's vision, the cast and crew, and the audience. However, by understanding the different approaches to directing Shakespeare, and by being open to new interpretations, directors can create productions that are both faithful to the playwright's original intent and relevant to contemporary audiences.

Directing Shakespeare in America: Current Practices

by Charles Ney

4.2 out of 5